³Õ¾±±ð·ÉÌý³Ù³ó±ðÌý°Õ±á·¡ÌýJapanÌýUniversity Rankings 2022 results

°Õ³ó±ðÌý̽»¨ÊÓƵÌýJapan University Rankings use a balanced scorecard approach, with 16 individual performance indicators combining to create an overall score that reflects the broad strength of an institution. The overall methodology explores four key areas, which we call pillars:

Resources

This pillar includes metrics onÌýfinance (income) per student (8%), which show whether the institution has the money to effectively deliver teaching, and theÌýratio of faculty members to students (8%), which gives a sense of whether the college has enough teachers to teach. We also look at theÌýscholarly output (7%)Ìý²¹²Ô»åÌýresearch grants per member of staffÌý(5%)Ìýat each institution. Having faculty who are experts in their academic fields can significantly enhance a student’s educational experience. The final metric measures the nationalÌýmock university examÌýscores (6%)Ìýreceived by institutions’ entrants to get an indication of the academic calibre required to gain admission to a particular university and its popularity among top students.

Engagement

This pillar measures opinions of the university from two sources: the High School Advisors Survey and the Japan Student Survey. The High School Advisors Survey gathers the views of student careers advisers fromÌýbetween 1,000 and 2,000 Japanese secondary schools each year. It asks advisers to name the top 15 universities that they believe teach students to the highestÌýglobal standards (6%), and the 15 universities that they think are best atÌýdeveloping students’ abilities (6%). We are also using data from the last two years of our student survey, which is based on the same model used in previous teaching-focused rankings. Responses to seven questions are used in three metrics in the following manner:

• °Õ³ó±ðÌýengagement metric (6%)Ìýuses scores from four questions, asking to what extent teaching at the university (1)Ìýsupports critical thinking, (2)Ìýsupports making connections among the things students have learned, (3)Ìýsupports applying the students’ learning to the real world, and (4)Ìýoffers classes that challenge the students.
• °Õ³ó±ðÌýinteractionÌýmetricÌý(6%)Ìýuses scores from two questions, asking how many opportunities the students had to (1) interact with the staff and faculty and (2) collaborate with their peers.
• °Õ³ó±ðÌýrecommendationÌýmetricÌý(6%)Ìýuses scores from one question, which asks how likely students would be to recommend their university to friends or family.

Outcomes

This pillar looks at the overallÌýacademic reputation (8%)Ìýof the university in Japan, based on votes from Japanese scholars inÌý°Õ±á·¡â€™s annual Academic Reputation Survey of leading academics worldwide, which helps us determine which institutions have the best reputation for excellence in teaching. We also consider theÌýreputation of the university among employers (8%)Ìýto get a sense of whetherÌýit produces graduates the market wants. This is based on a survey of human resources departments from 815 listed and non-listed companies. Each department was asked to identify the 10 best universities based on the strengths of their employees from those institutions. Each department then completed a survey for each of the 10Ìýuniversities that it identified, rating the employees from these institutions in several areas.

̽»¨ÊÓƵ

Environment

This pillar looks at the make-up of the student and staff body at each campus, helping students determine whether they will find themselves in a diverse, supportive and inclusive university environment. We examine the proportion ofÌýinternational students (5%)Ìý²¹²Ô»åÌýinternational staff (5%)Ìýon campus, which are key indicators of whether the university is able to attract talent from across the world. It also demonstrates which institutions have cultivated a multicultural campus where students from different backgrounds have the opportunity to learn from one another. We are also looking at two dimensions of internationalisation: the number of students in various types ofÌýinternational exchange programmes (5%), and the number ofÌýcourses taught in a language other than Japanese (5%).

Note: International exchange programmes have beenÌýsignificantly impacted byÌýthe Covid-19 pandemic, with travel restrictions decreasing the number of students participating, or leading to the cancellation of some programmes altogether. As a result,Ìýmost institutionsÌýreportedÌýa significantly lower figure for this metric this year when compared with last year. To ensure the stability of the ranking, we are therefore reusing last year'sÌýinternational exchange metric scores in the 2022 ranking.

̽»¨ÊÓƵ

Data sources

Data for the rankings come from a variety of sources. These include self-submitted data from the institutions as well as data gathered from Elsevier, Benesse Corporation, Nikkei Human Resources, the Japanese government and theÌý̽»¨ÊÓƵÌýAcademic Reputation Survey. Our data are, in most cases, normalised so that the value we assign in each metric can be compared sensibly with other metrics.

Explore our portfolio of global university rankings