探花视频

White House science adviser Lander quits over bullying claims

White House tried to keep MIT-Harvard professor in top post after he apologised for belittling female colleagues

Published on
February 8, 2022
Last updated
February 8, 2022

US president Joe Biden鈥檚 chief science adviser, Eric Lander, has resigned after an internal investigation showed him engaging in a pattern of bullying and demeaning his subordinate female co-workers.

The White House initially stuck by Professor Lander 鈥 a professor of biology at both the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University 鈥 despite the president鈥檚聽repeated promises聽in the past to fire anyone 鈥渙n the spot鈥 if they disrespected others.

But after a day of accumulating pressure, Professor Lander agreed to step down.

鈥淚 believe it is not possible to continue effectively in my role, and the work of this office is far too important to be hindered,鈥 Professor Lander聽聽to Mr Biden.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

The allegations were first made public by聽Politico, which said a White House investigation聽聽in its Office of Science and Technology Policy described a toxic environment of humiliation under Professor Lander鈥檚 leadership. The initial complaint came from Rachel Wallace, the OSTP general counsel, who told聽Politico聽she was demoted to deputy counsel for protesting the situation within the office.

Ms Wallace told聽Politico聽that Professor Lander 鈥渞etaliated against staff for speaking out and asking questions by calling them names, disparaging them, embarrassing them in front of their peers, laughing at them, shunning them, taking away their duties, and replacing them or driving them out of the agency. Numerous women have been left in tears, traumatised, and feeling vulnerable and isolated.鈥

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Six current and former OSTP staffers told聽Politico聽鈥渢hat while he bullies men and women, he appears to take delight in trying to embarrass female colleagues in front of others鈥.

The White House, in an initial statement on the matter, said its investigation 鈥渄id not find credible evidence of gender-based discrimination鈥, adding: 鈥淭he complainant鈥檚 reassignment was deemed appropriate.鈥 Yet, the White House said, the investigation did find violations of the federal 鈥渟afe and respectful workplace policy鈥, and said that Professor Lander and his office were 鈥渞equired to undertake a number of actions to the correct the behaviour鈥.

As the report was about to become public, Professor Lander wrote a letter of apology to his staff, admitting his disrespectful behaviours, saying that such conduct 鈥渞eflects poorly on this administration and interferes with our work鈥, and promising to do better in the future.

That left the White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, repeatedly trying to explain to reporters why Mr Biden鈥檚 zero-tolerance promise did not apply to Professor Lander.

Ms Psaki, buffeted during her聽聽with questions about the White House鈥檚 decision to retain Professor Lander, argued that the chief goal behind Mr Biden鈥檚 pledge to immediately fire anyone who disrespects others was 鈥渢o prevent this behaviour from ever happening again鈥.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor Lander, however, had arrived at the OSTP job amid concern over his gender attitudes. During the US Senate聽hearing on his confirmation聽be OSTP director, he admitted that he downplayed the importance of Nobel prizewinners Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier in developing the transformative CRISPR gene-editing technology, and denied that he knew of the late Jeffrey Epstein鈥檚 sex crimes convictions when he held meetings with the infamous financier.

By evening, Professor Lander was losing support within his own party. The top Democrat and Republican on the House science committee jointly wrote to Mr Biden to ask for a copy of the White House investigation. The allegations against Professor Lander were 鈥渆xtremely troubling鈥, the lawmakers told the president.

Professor Lander has for decades been a leading figure in both science and science policy. He was the founding director of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, and co-chair of the Obama administration鈥檚 Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. He grew close to Mr Biden and the president鈥檚 determination to fight cancer following the 2015 death of his son Beau. As vice-president in the Obama administration, Mr Biden pushed for greater research efforts through what he called his Cancer Moonshot initiative.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Before the allegations against Professor Lander became public, but after the White House concluded its investigation, Professor Lander joined Mr Biden last week at聽聽where Mr Biden promised that Professor Lander 鈥渨ill chart the path for the Cancer Moonshot for 2022 and beyond鈥.

The controversy comes as US universities are themselves trying to set firm new boundaries on unacceptable conduct toward subordinates and women. In one of the most high-profile cases, just last month, the University of Michigan聽fired its president, Mark Schlissel, after finding he engaged in a sexual relationship with an employee.

Mr Biden elevated the OSTP director position to Cabinet rank to demonstrate his commitment to science, and the controversy over Professor Lander made him the last of the president鈥檚 22 Cabinet posts to win confirmation, and the first to resign.

Professor Lander said in his letter of resignation that he would leave OSTP no later than 18 February, 鈥渋n order to permit an orderly transfer鈥.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

paul.basken@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

Creating a toxic workplace, bullying and taking delight in the belittlement of others are all indictive of a psychopathic personality and under this regime of abuse there is a huge increase in staff exit behaviour. A climate of fear is created when stone cold psychopaths are at work and appointment to leadership positions should be dependent on personality assessments to gauge fitness for leadership. Great leaders are humble, open to suggestions from subordinates, intelligent, conscientious, agreeable and truthful. Clive Boddy

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT