Reintroducing maintenance grants and prioritising support for disadvantaged students should be聽seen as聽bigger priorities for a聽future UK聽government than abolishing tuition fees, according to聽new polling.

High public support for getting rid of聽the 拢9,250 yearly cost of聽taking a聽degree in聽England erodes as聽practicalities are taken into account, with little enthusiasm for raising taxes to聽pay for universities, Public First and Progressive Britain found in a聽report published on 9聽October.

With the Labour Party conference beginning in Liverpool, the research also suggests that Sir Keir Starmer鈥檚 decision to scrap his party鈥檚 pledge to abolish fees will not cause him electoral damage. Forty-three per cent of those polled backed the decision to U-turn on the pledge, compared with 30聽per cent who opposed it, with the proportions higher among swing voters.

鈥淭uition fees are not a popular policy, and in the abstract there is a high level of support for fee abolition,鈥� the report states. Forty-five per cent of people agreed that 鈥渦niversity should be free for students, with the cost of their education covered by the government and paid for through general taxation鈥�.

探花视频

But when asked to prioritise against other spending commitments or told how much fee cuts would cost the taxpayer, this enthusiasm falls away. Just 32聽per cent supported abolishing fees when told that it would cost 拢11聽billion a聽year, and 29聽per cent said they would support rises in their basic rate tax payments to cover the cost. Raising corporation tax to pay for fee abolition was the only option that received net positive support.

In contrast, reintroducing maintenance grants for poorer students 鈥渋s聽popular with voters, and was seen as a greater priority than the abolition of tuition fees themselves鈥�, the report states.

探花视频

When voters were asked directly if they supported reintroducing maintenance grants, with the extra cost paid for via increased taxation, 55聽per cent said they did and 50聽per cent said they would be more likely to vote for a party that pledged such a policy.

The polling also identified support for cutting fees for specific groups, for example students from low-income families or those taking courses seen as socially or economically important.

Introducing a graduate tax was more popular than abolishing fees overall, and enjoyed higher support among younger voters. And 59聽per cent backed the idea that corporations should pay more into the system 鈥渁s a levy businesses pay to universities who train their workers鈥�.

Nathan Yeowell, executive director of Progressive Britain, said the findings showed that the public 鈥渄on鈥檛 want a revolution in funding structures鈥� for higher education but they 鈥渟hare with the Labour Party a desire for a more progressive system of fees, one which does more to give those from the poorest backgrounds the chance to get on鈥�.

探花视频

Ed Dorrell, partner at Public First, said the public were 鈥渁s ever, quite sensible鈥� in that 鈥渢hey see the value that universities can add both to individual young people and to society 鈥� and that students, especially from the poorest homes, should be supported to study.

鈥淏ut they also see that other avenues need to be funded properly, especially the creation of a much wider and more extensive apprenticeship offer. Labour would do well to act on this insight.鈥�

tom.williams@timeshighereducation.com