The international activities of UK universities have created a 鈥渉ighly knowledge-intensive export industry鈥 and are a prime example of innovation in the public sector 鈥 but government funding cuts put that under threat.
That is the message of a report published today by The Work Foundation, singling out case studies that suggest the public sector should be 鈥渃orrectly thought of and supported as a knowledge economy sector鈥.
A narrow focus on cuts and the 鈥渙utsourcing鈥 of innovation to the private sector risks neglecting the potential of the public sector itself, the report argues.
It cites estimates that the international education sector contributes 拢40 billion to the UK economy, second only to the financial services industry.
探花视频
The key factors for this success identified in the report are the result of exploitation of several 鈥減ublic intangible assets鈥 including: the 鈥渂rands鈥 of its universities; research excellence that attracts postgraduates; the 鈥渕ature institutional environment鈥 anchored by bodies such as the Higher Education Funding Council for England; the greater study intensity of degrees that are shorter than those in the US and continental Europe; and the cultural experience offered by the UK.
Charles Levy, senior researcher at The Work Foundation, said the report, Making the Most of Public Services: A Systems Approach to Public Innovation, looks at the UK鈥檚 international higher education market as 鈥渁 highly knowledge-intensive export industry鈥 and as 鈥渁 good example of the way in which the public sector can create value from what it has鈥. But the report warns that the UK鈥檚 main competitors, including Australia, Germany and the US, 鈥渉ave all increased public sector funding for higher education to stimulate economic growth鈥.
探花视频
It says funding uncertainties for UK universities 鈥渟hould be viewed as a cause for concern鈥, with future sharp cuts in capital funding 鈥渁 particular worry鈥.
Other concerns identified include the end of funding under the Prime Minister鈥檚 initiative to promote UK education abroad, and the recent tightening of visa rules.
鈥淒espite public recognition of the importance of international education, policy does not appear to be offering clear backing for these activities 鈥 future funding of the sector remains uncertain, and action on visas risks sending the wrong signals to prospective students,鈥 the report concludes.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?