探花视频

The Man Who Knew Infinity: another beautiful mind on screen

As the latest film about academia is released, Matthew Reisz considers the portrayal of mathematicians and other scholars in popular culture

Published on
April 8, 2016
Last updated
February 16, 2017
Mathematics backdrop
Source: iStock
Mathematicians鈥 work may be dizzying to most people, but their life stories can be dramatic

There are relatively few aspects of academic life that lend themselves to full-scale cinematic or dramatic treatment.

There are the tales of sexual encounters, usually between staff and students, and sometimes leading to murder, to be found most recently in Woody Allen鈥檚 2015 film聽Irrational Man. There are stories of outsiders trying to breach the walls of the establishment and often paying the price, for example in the steady stream of films about Alan Turing. And there are stories of genius-akin-to-madness typified by Ron Howard鈥檚 2001 biopic of the mathematician John Nash, A Beautiful Mind. This includes a rather lame attempt to describe Nash鈥檚 crucial contribution to game theory in terms of an example where all the men in a bar try to pick up the most attractive woman and succeed only in obstructing each other. It concludes with a characteristic Hollywood flourish, with Nash (played by Russell Crowe) deciding that what really matters are 鈥渢he equations of love鈥.

A play about another mathematical theorist who lapsed into madness can currently be seen at the Camden People鈥檚 Theatre in London. explores the extraordinary career of George Price (1922-75).

Price was a wide-ranging thinker who came up with an equation that he believed got to the heart of human nature, since, as his character explains, it 鈥渄escribes how altruistic behaviour is governed by our genes鈥. We see him turning up off the street at University College London鈥檚 Galton Laboratory in 1968 and within 80 minutes being given 鈥渁 desk, an office and a fellowship鈥. But if loyalty to one鈥檚 kin is the essence of what makes us tick, why has he abandoned his wife and small daughters in New York? And what does it mean for free will and human dignity if 鈥渢he equation applies to every choice in life. There is no escaping the equation. There鈥檚 only the equation.鈥

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Eventually the strain drives Price off the rails: 鈥淥n 7 June 1970 I give in and admit God exists. Not long after, I mix his only son a martini.鈥 Giving his possessions away to the poor and inviting the homeless into his flat unsurprisingly fails to solve his problems. He eventually commits suicide and is buried in St Pancras Cemetery, less than a mile from where the audience is sitting in the theatre. Adetunji creates a striking play from this poignant story, although she admits that she has sometimes modified the facts. As the narrator explains at one point, the writing and rewriting process works a bit like evolution, eventually homing in on 鈥渢he fittest version of George Price鈥 to produce the right dramatic effect.

Meanwhile, Hollywood has also found inspiration in another outsider academic with the release of Matthew Brown鈥檚 The Man Who Knew Infinity, which is released in the UK on 8 April. The events of 鈥渢he most romantic episode in my life鈥 are described by Cambridge mathematician G. H. Hardy (Jeremy Irons). This concerned the self-taught Indian mathematical genius Srinivasa Ramanujan (Dev Patel), whose wife suspects he 鈥渓ove[s] numbers more than people鈥 鈥 and who was also the subject of Th茅芒tre de Complicit茅鈥檚 2007 play聽A Disappearing Number.聽When he sends some of his results to Cambridge, Hardy recognises his exceptional talent and invites him to Trinity College.

探花视频

ADVERTISEMENT

England in 1914 hardly proves welcoming. Ramanujan is inevitably called 鈥渓ittle wog鈥, told that high-level mathematics is not for the likes of him and finds it difficult to produce the formal proofs of his conjectures required by the mathematical journals. But Hardy, a buttoned-up man of firm habits, is slowly melted and transformed by their encounter. He eventually manages to convince his hostile colleagues to give Ramanujan a fellowship and is devastated by his death in 1920.聽Although聽slightly predictable and sentimental, it is hard not to be moved by such a strange cross-cultural intellectual 鈥渞omance鈥.

matthew.reisz@tesglobal.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Recent films fail to recognise the support women give to famous male artists or scientists, says Mary Evans

12 February

Independent 'citizen scientists' have always existed, says Darrel Ince, and our networked age of fast computing and open access is helping them to flourish - to the greater good of research

20 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT